Let us start with something that might not sit comfortably.
When an exams department is struggling – missing deadlines, firefighting daily issues, or facing compliance risks then it is very rarely down to one person.
And yet, that is often where the focus lands.
The exams officer/exams manager
The person at the centre of it all. The one expected to hold everything together. The one quietly carrying the weight of compliance, accuracy, deadlines and accountability.
But here is the truth: exams do not succeed or fail because of one individual.
They succeed (or struggle) because of the system around them.
Responsibility vs Reality
On paper in the JCQ guidance the responsibility for ensuring compliance sits with the Head of Centre. That is clear. That is a non-negotiable.
In reality, that responsibility is almost always delegated typically to an exams officer or exams manager.
And that is where the disconnect can begin.
Because while responsibility can be delegated, accountability cannot simply disappear. Nor can the infrastructure, support and training required to carry that responsibility effectively.
We often see centres where this delegation happens with the best intentions but without the necessary framework behind it.
A role is assigned.
A login is created.
A quick handover is given (if you are “lucky”)
And then… the expectation is that everything will run smoothly.
The “Training” Myth
We work with fantastic proactive centres with training and mentoring but through the conversations happening daily in our online community, a recurring theme emerges:
It is common for exams staff have had little to no formal training.
Some have had a single day.
Some have inherited the role with minimal handover.
Some are learning as they go while managing high-stakes processes with zero margin for error.
Pause on that for a moment.
We are talking about professionals who may be managing entry budgets of hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Who are responsible for regulatory compliance.
Who oversee the recruitment, training and day-to-day management of invigilators.
Who coordinate with awarding bodies, senior leadership teams, teaching staff and external stakeholders.
In what other profession would that level of responsibility be handed over with so little structured support?
It is a question worth sitting with.



